Wills and Estates Cheat Sheet

A cheat sheet in English by parkeraz
17,903 views 3,334 downloads 22 Jul 2019 History
3.7 avg · 0 ratings

Defini­tions

Decedent
Someone who has died
Will
Legal document used to dispose of the decede­nt's property
Testate
Decedent dies with a will
Intestate
Decedent dies without a will
Codicil
Supplement that either amends or revokes a decede­nt's will in whole or in part
Probate
Judicial process for admini­stering and settling decede­nt's estates
Intestate Succession
Default estate plan for distri­buting property

People

Heirs
Indivi­duals entitled to receive property by intestate succession
Spouse
Decede­nt's marital partner
Issue/ Descen­dants
Decede­nt's lineal line
Ancestors
Decede­nt's parental line
Collat­erals
Decede­nt's relatives through an ancestor

Intestacy

Intent
irrele­vent- follow legisl­atures guide
heirs
entitled to take an intestate share
survival
key factor in taking from the decedent
Simult­aneous death
Uniform Probate Code (UPC)- an heir must be proven by clear and convincing evidence to have survived the decedent by 120 hours
Without Heirs
Property will escheat to the state

Spouse­'s Share

who qualifies?
Legally married partner
Spouse + Shared Descen­dants
surviving spouse takes the entirety
Spouse + parent
Surviving spouse takes $300,000 and 75% of remainder of estate
Spouse+ shared descen­dants+ Spouse­'s kids
Surviving spouse takes $225,000 and 50% of remainder of estate
Spouse + non-sp­ousal kids
Surviving spouse takes $150,000 and 50% of remainder of estate
Just spouse
Surviving spouse takes the entire estate

Issue

Lineal line
must be a parent­-child relati­onship
Adoptive children
inherit from decedent just like biological children
Stepparent adoption
Will not prevent adoptee from inheriting from other genetic parent
Posthu­mously Born children
If child is born 280 (or 300 under UPA) days of husban­d's death, there is a rebuttable presum­ption that the child is husbands and will inherit from the husband

Calcul­ating Issue's Share

Per Stirpes
Divide shares into the total number of children who survive or leave issue who survive and then divide by repres­ent­ation
Per capita by repres­ent­ation
Divide property equally at the first generation where a member survives decedent; If a deceased member of a generation is not survived by living issue, then that member does not take a share
Per capita at each generation (UPC)
Divide property into equal shares at the first generation where there is a surviving member; pools the remainder share after each generation and divide equally

Execution of Wills

Three Formal Will Requir­ements
signed writing, witnesses, and testam­entary intent
Signed Writing
must be written, signed at end or anywhere under UPC- must show intended to be signature; nothing after signature will be valid; doesn't need to be formal signature
Capacity
must be at least 18 years of age and of sound mind at the time of signing
Witness (Attes­tation)
majority- presence of witnesses and testator; UPC- witnesses must sign within a reasonable time of original signature by testator
"in the presen­ce"
Tradit­ional- line of sight; Modern approach- conscious presence
Interested witness
Has a direct financial interest in the will- common law (not competent witness), UPC (abolished doctrine), and Purge theory
Purge theory
Interested witness does not affect the validity of a will BUT probate court will purge any gain in excess of what the witness would take under intestate succession
Present Testam­entary Intent
must have the present intent
Failure to Satisfy Formal­ities
Common law/ majority- strive compli­ance; UPC- substa­ntial compliance by clear and convincing evidence

Hologr­aphic Wills

informal
handwr­itten will
requir­ements
must be signed but doesn't need witnesses
How much writing?
some jurisd­iction- anything not in handwr­iting will invalidate will; UPC- only requires material provisions be in handwr­iting
Intent
look for words or phrases suggesting intent; UPC authorizes looking to extrinsic evidence

Codicils

Supplement
Does not replace an underlying will
Formal­ities
executed with the same formal­ities as a will

Will Substi­tutes

Joint tenancy
Avoids probate because it has a right of surviv­orship
Revocable Trust
Avoids probate because it has an inter vivos transfer
Pour-Over Will
Avoids probate because it distri­butes property under a trust
POD Contract
Avoids probate because it distri­butes by inter vivos transfer
Deed
Avoids probate because it is an inter vivos transfer

Revocation of a Will

Ambulatory
altered or revoked any time until the testat­or's death; can be revoked in whole or in part
Subsequent Instrument
express revoca­tion; implied revoca­tion/ incons­istency
Physical act
intent for physical act to revoke will; majority- particular language must be destroyed; UPC- destru­ctive act affect some part of the will
Lost will
creates a rebuttable presum­ption that the testator revoked the will by physical act; burden on proponent to show will's existence by clear and convincing evidence
Operation of Law
divorce revokes all will provisions in favor of former spouse (UPC extends to ex's relati­ves); subsequent marriage does not revoke a will because of elective shares

Third Party Revocation

Third party can revoke on behalf of testator if
at testat­or's direction and in testat­or's conscious presence

Third Party Revocation

Third party can revoke on behalf of testator if
at testat­or's direction and in testat­or's conscious presence

Revoking Codicils

by revoking a will
testator also revokes any codicil attached to the will; revoking a codicil does not revoke the will

Revival

Republ­ication
UPC/ majority does not recognize automatic revival of a revoked will
Dependent Relative Revocation (DRR)
Safe valve for testators who revoke a will on the basis of mistake (of law or fact); invali­dates the mistaken revocation and revives the earlier revoked will

Constr­uction/ Interp­ret­ation

Plain Meaning
assume the testator meant the plain meaning of what he said
Incorp­oration by Reference
Wil refers to document outside will can incorp­orate if: document exists at time of execution, testator intends incorp­ora­tion, document described with sufficient certainty
Acts of Indepe­ndent Signif­icance
Testator can dispose of property based on some act or event that is unrelated to the execution of the will
Lapse
Common law: testam­entary gift would lapse if intended benefi­ciary did not survive the testator; failed gift dumped into the residuary gift
Anti-lapse
Prevents certain gifts from lapsing. Requires protected relati­onship, survived by issue,
Exception to lapsed gifts rule
Class gifts- if member­'s gift lapses, the rest of the class share that member­'s gift unless anti-lapse controls
Abatement
If the estate does not have sufficient funds to pay debts or make gifts, the gifts will be abated, or reduced, in a specific order.
Abatement hierarchy
intestate property, residuary gift, general gifts, special gifts
Ademption by Extinction
specific piece of property no longer in estate. Tradit­ional- devise is extinct; UPC- look at testat­or's intent at time she disposed of property (prefe­rence for replac­ement property)
Ademption by Satisf­action
testator satisfies a specific or demons­trative gift by inter vivos transfer. Testator must intend for gift to adeem and must be supported by writing
Ambigu­ities
tradit­ional- can only use extrinsic evidence to resolve latent (not on face) ambigu­ities; modern rule- both can use extrinsic evidence
Mistakes
Courts are less forgiving when it comes to mistakes

Power to Transfer

Rights of Surviving Spouse
elective share (forced share- 50% under UPC); waiver to elective share must be in writing after fair disclosure and with repres­ent­ation
Gifts to Children- Advanc­ements
lifetime gift that satisfies child's intestate share. Common law- lifetime gift is presumed to be advanc­ement; UPC- only advanc­ement if contem­por­aneous writing or writing that gift should be taken into account in computing division of estate
Calcul­ating effect of advanc­ement: “Hotchpot” analysis
Add the value of the advanc­ements back into the intestate estate, Divide the resulting estate by the number of children taking, Deduct the child’s advanc­ement from the child’s intestate share.
Omitted Children
intent­ional disinh­eri­tance; uninte­nti­onal- takes intestate share or portion from what is devised to children
Slayer Rule
A benefi­ciary who murders the decedent is barred from taking under the decedent’s will; UPC allows killer­'s issue to take when relevant
Disclaimer
signed writing that is filed with court OR declared to estate distri­butor AND Identify the decedent, describe the interest being discla­imed; within 9 months of decede­nt's death
Elder Abuse
Someone who is convicted of financial exploi­tation, abuse, or neglect of a person under her care is prohibited from inheriting from that person.

Will Contests

standing
only an interested party
time for filing
6 months after will is admitted to probate
Testam­entary capacity
burden on contester to show that when will was executed, testator lacked the ability to know: nature of act, nature and character of property, natural objects of bounty, plan of attempted dispos­ition
Insane Delusion
testator has general capacity but has an insane delusion as to some belief. Measure against actions of a rational person (also need to prove but-for causation)
Undue Influence
contestant bears burden of showing: benefi­ciary received a substa­ntial relati­onship, benefi­ciary had a confid­ential relati­onship with testator, and testator had weakened intellect. THEN burden shift to proponent to show no undue influence by prepon­derance of the evidence
Fraud
contestant bears burden of showing benefi­ciary made misrep­res­ent­ation wit the intent to deceive the testator and the purpose of influe­ncing the testam­entary dispos­ition. Remedied by constr­uctive trust
Forfeiture Clauses
in terrorem: no-contest clause designed to dissuade a benefi­ciary from suing about his share; under UPC clause is unenfo­rceable if probable cause to challenge

Probate Process

classify
each piece of property is probate or non-pr­obate
probate
passes by will or intestate succession
non-pr­obate
property is transf­erred by another document
Primary purpose
Orderly admini­str­ation of a decedent’s estate
Filing under UPC
Probate procee­dings must be brought within ______­___­___­___­___­___­___­______ years of death, after which there is a presum­ption of intestacy. Can choose informal or formal probate
Creditors
Non-claim statutes: bar claims after time; must be given notice by personal repres­ent­ative
Personal Repres­ent­ative
person who acts on behalf of estate during probate process (admin­ist­rator if by court or executor if by will)
Duties of Personal Repres­ent­ative
inventory and appraise estate, contact interested parties, satisfy debts, close the estate
Duties owed by personal repres­ent­ative
loyalty and care
Choosing a personal repres­ent­ative
surviving spouse who is devisee, other surviving devisee, surviving spouse, other heirs, any creditor (45 days after decede­nt's death)
Power of Appoin­tment
Ability of decedent to select an individual to dispose of certain property under the will. General- no condit­ions; special- donor limits donee's power
Powers of Attorney
An authority to act on another’s behalf in a legal or business matter. Must be in writing, signed, and dated. Types: General, special, Advanced healthcare directive (living will or durable power of attorney for health­care)

Comments

No comments yet.

Cheatography n. The art of mapping complex subjects into clear, instantly navigable reference guides.