Assessing the quality and relevance of resources for academic and research purposes.
|
* When was this posted/published?
|
|
|
* Has this information been revised/updated?
|
|
|
* Is it important to have the latest information, or will older sources work?
|
|
* Who is the author, publisher, or source?
|
|
* What are their credentials?
|
|
* Is the source trustworthy?
|
|
* Can I find out any more information?
|
|
* If a website, what does the URL tell me about the source?
|
|
* What does the information do?
|
|
|
* Is the purpose clear and the point of view impartial or are there biases?
|
|
|
* Is the information fact, opinion, or propaganda?
|
|
* Does it relate to my research or answer my question?
|
|
|
* Is it at an appropriate level?
|
|
|
* Have I looked at various sources to see if this one is relevant to me?
|
|
|
* Am I comfortable citing this as a reputable source for my research?
|
|
* Where does the information come from?
|
|
|
* Is it supported by current evidence?
|
|
|
* Can I verify any of the information in another reliable source?
|
|
|
* Does the tone or language seem balanced, unbiased, and free from errors?
|
No comments yet.
Cheatography n. The art of mapping complex subjects into clear, instantly navigable reference guides.
