3 page sheet + matrix for exam (double sided)
|
Categorical/Nominal
|
Do not hold numerical meaning (arbitrary)
|
|
Ordinal
|
Rank ordering, differences not equal
|
|
Interval
|
Intervals between points on a scale are equal and the same, zero is arbitrary
|
|
Ratio
|
Zero is NOT arbitrary (an absence)
|
|
Balanced
|
each cell (each combination of factors) contain the same number of replications (how many measurements
|
|
Complete
|
every level of one factor combined with every level of the other factor(s)
|
|
Incomplete
|
Lots of factors or many measurements (nested/block design best)
|
|
Single subject/repeated measures
|
Subject acts as their own control
|
|
Data Shape
|
Frequency distributions are a common way to describe data shape (range of scores)
|
|
Location
|
finding central tendency or middle of data
|
|
Spread
|
Variance -> range, SD and IQR
|
|
Outliers
|
|
|
Clustering
|
e.g. bimodal distribution
|
|
Granularity
|
Data only takes on certain values (e.g. discrete data + rounded continuous)
|
|
(e.g. discrete data + rounded continuous)
|
|
|
Random
|
Increased ability to generalise to population
|
|
Systematic
|
Choosing subjects from a population at a regular interval (choosing every second item)
|
|
Cluster
|
Randomly select a few schools in your sample and have all students as participants
|
|
Convenience
|
Sample used because it is accessible rather than representative of a population
|
|
Strength
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
|
Strong
|
.8 to 1
|
-.8 to -1
|
|
Moderate
|
.5 to .7
|
-.5 to -.7
|
|
Weak
|
0 to .4
|
0 to -.4
|
|
DF
|
Sum of Squares
|
Mean Sqaure
|
|
|
Between Groups
|
no. groups -1
|
How much data varies between different groups (variance)
|
Average variance between groups
|
|
Within Groups
|
no. data points - no. of groups
|
How much data varies within each group (variance)
|
Average variance within groups
|
|
Total
|
no. data points - 1
|
||
|
One-way
|
1 factor/independent variable (categorical)
|
|
Two-way
|
2+ factors/IVs (categorical), interactions
|
|
Repeated Measures
|
Measure the same outcome variable on the same population twice
|
|
Each subject is now a random factor (rather than fixed factors)
|
|
Test
|
Description
|
DF
|
|
1-sample (single)
|
Compares your experimental group with a hypothesised or known value
|
n-1
|
|
2-sample (independent)
|
Compares the means for two independent samples
|
(n1-1) + (n2-1)
|
|
Paired
|
measuring something for the same group of people
|
n-1
|
|
Beta
|
degree of change in the outcome variable for every 1 unit of change in the predictor variable
|
|
R-Sqaured
|
Fit of the model and represents how much variance in the DV can be accounted for by the IV
|
|
Analysis of Variance
|
Adj SS (adjusted sum of squares) -> total variance of data
|
|
- The error SS is what is left over -> variance that cannot be explained by other factors or variance in the model
|
|
Parametric
|
Non-Parametric
|
|
1-sample AND paired t-test
|
Sign test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test
|
|
2-sample t-test
|
Mann-Whitney test
|
|
One-way ANOVA
|
Kruskal-Wallis test
|
|
Multifactor ANOVA (two-way + repeated measures)
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Chi-square test
|
|
Transcripts (e.g. interview)
|
Allows the researcher to ask about specific things and probe deeply
|
|
Observation
|
ethnographic studies
|
|
Pictures
|
Pictures could be photos that the researcher has taken (drawings, rooms etc)
|
|
Documents
|
Many types (e.g. progress notes)
|
|
Web content
|
Publicly available (e.g. social media)
|
|
Typical Case
|
Average case
|
|
Extreme case
|
Unusual, unique or distinct case
|
|
Maximum Variation
|
Looking for the biggest range of perspectives
|
|
Homogenous Group
|
Minimum variation sampling + Focus on in-depth area of interest
|
|
Stratified Purpose
|
Selected cases from identified subgroups (e.g. 5 people from 4 age groups)
|
|
Theoretical
|
Start data collection -> analyse results -> form therapy -> continue sampling
|
|
Snow Ball
|
One respondent is asked to suggest others.
|
|
Convinience
|
Recruiting anyone who is at hand
|
|
Tangibly (concrete)
|
Intangibly
|
|
Guidelines, protocols
|
understanding what clients want from their clinicians
|
|
practice recommendations based on qual research
|
broaden knowledge and change behaviours
|
|
Deductive (top-down)
|
Inductive (bottom-up)
|
|
coding will be influenced by the framework you're using
|
coding will be purely based on what the participant has said, without trying to fit it into a framework.
|
No comments yet.
Cheatography n. The art of mapping complex subjects into clear, instantly navigable reference guides.